28 Feb 2010

10 Feb 2010

17 Jan 2010

PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS DATA By Atty. Neri Javier Colmenares May 14, 2008
Introduction: Habeas Data  as a Legal Notion
The writ of habeas data is a relatively new legal notion compared to the traditional writ of habeas corpus and the recently promulgated writ of amparo.  Habeas data literally means you should have the data, and is defined by Latin American legal scholars as a writ designed to protect through a petition or complaint, the image, privacy, honor, information self-determination and freedom of information of a person¯.
Although many will argue that its origin stemmed from Europe, particularly the Council of Europe's 108th Convention on Data Protection of 1981, it is Brazil which directly and expressly enshrined its provisions into law through Law 824 [December 28, 1984, Rio de Janeiro] and subsequently under Article 5, LXXII of its Constitution which states that habeas data is granted:
14 May 2008
The Common Right to Privacy by Chief Justice Reynato Puno
The writ of habeas data finds its justification on the right to privacy.
Allow me therefore to deal very briefly about the right to privacy. The
“right to privacy” is a right inherent in human beings. From the dawn of time
when man lived in what Thomas Hobbes called, the State of Nature where
the individual was lawmaker, law enforcer and law interpreter of the laws of
nature—the “right to be let alone” existed not as a claim but as part of the
natural order. John Locke argued that this “natural condition of mankind” is
what would exist if there were no government, no laws, and no common
power to restrain human nature. The state of nature is a “war of all against
all,” in which human beings constantly seek to destroy each other in an
incessant pursuit for self-advancement and power. Hence, when human
beings formed societies and entered into social contracts—the first provision
that the individual consented to is that he or she shall live with others, and
hence, shall not live alone. The “right to be let alone” was voluntarily
curtailed in exchange for living in a common society governed by common
laws that protect life, liberty and property.
12 Mar 2008
LAWYERS’ RESPONSE
We live in a time of political turmoil where impunity in human rights violations and general lawlessness grip the nation and serious economic disorder.
12 Mar 2008
Introduction of Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno
In introducing our distinguished speaker, I will deviate from the traditional way of enumerating his credentials and achievements from his Resume.  Undoubtedly, these are impressive and impeccable, as we all know.  Instead, allow me to trigger your attention to his principles and philosophy as eloquently articulated in his speeches, ponencias and opinions.  And in this regard, I candidly admit that I am just beginning to re-read or read thoroughly Chief Justice Puno’s important works particularly those that pertain to our field of law practice which I fondly call lawyering for the oppressed and exploited sectors of our society.  I urge you all, especially the young lawyers, to read Chief Justice Puno’s opinions and speeches.  Chief Justice Puno’s incisive writings have a unique way of sharpening our understanding of Philippine law and its relevance to the root causes of the problems of Philippine society, particularly the centuries-old problems of poverty, social injustice and deprivation of genuine freedom, democracy and sovereignty.  More importantly, the pervading sincerity and simplicity that radiate from his writings have also a unique and compelling way of deepening the reader’s commitment to the rule of law, to the struggle for human rights and a just and humane society, to our rejection and unwavering crusade against corruption and to our ultimate goal of a genuinely free, sovereign and prosperous nation.
12 Mar 2008
 

Writ of Amparo

Writ of Habeas Data

Anti-Torture Law

Human Security Act

Economic Social and Cultural Rights